Skip to main content

Rose v. State

Citations

  • 810 N.E.2d 361
  • 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 1111
  • 2004 WL 1336642

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the court did not err in finding that addictions were not a mitigating circumstance
  • finding no abuse of discretion in trial court’s failure to find mitigator in addiction when defendant had failed to take advantage of prior opportunities to receive drug treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.