Supreme Court of Delaware· 6/30/1988
Rose v. State
Citations
- 542 A.2d 1196
- 1988 Del. LEXIS 204
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a delay in disclosure does not amount to suppression unless the delay somehow prejudiced defendant
- “[w]hen a defendant is confronted with delayed disclosure of Brady material, reversal will be granted only if the defendant was denied the opportunity to use the material”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Christie, Walsh, Holland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lilly v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1994-11-28· cited 72×
- Atkinson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-07-18· cited 29×
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2003-02-06· cited 25×
- Goode v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2016-04-04· cited 16×
- Lance v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1991-11-18· cited 3×
- Liu v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2014-10-27
- State v. BrownSuperior Court of Delaware· 2018-04-06
- McGriff v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2023-01-27
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2026-01-15
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-03· cited 1,195×
- Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-10-12· cited 766×
- United States v. Seymour Pollack, United States of America v. Paul M. Sachs, United States of America v. William CuddD.C. Circuit· 1976-03-31· cited 127×
- United States v. HiggsThird Circuit· 1983-08-05· cited 116×
- Remington v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1986-06-16· cited 97×
- United States v. David Brydie Mitchell, Jose Carlos Prado, Reinaldo Rabeiro, Robert Webster Cary, Iii, and John DoyleFifth Circuit· 1986-01-02· cited 74×
- United States v. Ralph Johnston, United States of America v. Michael Andrews, United States of America v. Edward RistFirst Circuit· 1986-02-20· cited 61×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.