Rose v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to appoint additional experts where several experts had been previously appointed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ramirez v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-01-05· cited 72×
• Marshall v. Crosby
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-05-26· cited 29×
• Brim v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-12· cited 10×
• Alexander v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-10· cited 9×
• Hawkins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-21· cited 5×
• Martuccio v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-12· cited 4×
• Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Cichon
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-02· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ake v. Oklahoma
  Supreme Court· 1985-02-26· cited 3,332×
• Martin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-08-28· cited 31×
• Salas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-04-06· cited 23×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-01-19· cited 4×
• Allen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-12-22· cited 4×