Rose v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• excluding a police officer’s telephonic testimony at a suppression hearing because it was not shown that he was unavailable
• stating “suspicion” will “not rise to the level of probable cause”
• stating \suspicion\ will \not rise to the level of probable cause\
• the court excluded the testimony of an out-of-state police officer in a Miranda hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bell
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-07-14· cited 34×
• Barry v. Lindner
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2003-12-31· cited 33×
• Friend v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-11-15· cited 30×
• Addison v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-02-20· cited 27×
• Aqua Marine Prod. v. Pathe Computer
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-12-15· cited 21×
• Byrd v. Nix
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1989-09-13· cited 14×
• Robertson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-02-27· cited 14×
• Urquhart v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1990-01-17· cited 7×
• Barry v. Lindner
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2003-08-29
• King v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2002-04-03
• Lilly v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-09-25