· 6/26/2001
Rose v. Shaw, 00-2489 (2001)
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing complaint and state court documents in ruling on a motion to dismiss
- stating privity “is merely a word used to say that the relationship between one who is a party on the record and another is close enough to include that other within the res judicata” (quoting Marran v. Marran, 376 F.3d 143, 151 (3d Cir. 2004))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: GIBNEY, J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.