Skip to main content
· 6/26/2001

Rose v. Shaw, 00-2489 (2001)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing complaint and state court documents in ruling on a motion to dismiss
  • stating privity “is merely a word used to say that the relationship between one who is a party on the record and another is close enough to include that other within the res judicata” (quoting Marran v. Marran, 376 F.3d 143, 151 (3d Cir. 2004))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: GIBNEY, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.