Rose v. Shalala

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ALJ could not rely on vocational expert's response to find claimant disabled because hypothetical impermissibly omitted significant functional limitation claimant had
• ruling that the ALJ erred in failing to mention any functional limitation arising from the symptoms of plaintiff’s impairment
• holding that ALJ cannot rely on VE's testimony when hypothetical omits significant functional limitation
• cautioning that the amount of weight accorded to nonexamining physicians varies with the circumstances and that in some cases written reports submitted by nonexamining physicians cannot constitute substantial evidence
• instructing that reliance on the Grid is not dispositive where non-exertional limitations are present
• noting absence of definitive diagnostic tests for chronic fatigue syndrome and that it is characterized by persistent unexplained fatigue and a lack of objective proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).