· 4/15/1889
Rose v. Perkins
Citations
- 98 Mo. 253
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A lesser-included offense is one which must necessarily be included in the greater offense.” (quotation and brackets omitted)
- no double jeopardy violation where defendant was convicted of kidnapping and criminal threatening in the same transaction despite similar elements and factual allegations in the charging documents
- “The similarity of evidence used to prove some of the elements does not mean that the same evidence is required for all of the elements.” (brackets and quotation omitted)
- mens rea for criminal threatening is that the defendant acted “purposely”
- “double description” case involving kidnapping and criminal threatening charges
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barclay, Brace, Sherwood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.