Rose v. Ohio Dept. of Commerce
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1856
Syllabus
On Respondent's objections to a Special Master's Report and Recommendation, the Court overruled Respondent's objections and adopted the Report and Recommendation. The Court denied Respondent's Motion To Dismiss and ordered Respondent to produce all responsive public records that document actions that Respondent may have taken in response to Requester's complaint of December 2021 about a certain mobile home park operated by the Society of Sportsmen, Inc. The Court determined that Requester was entitled to recover from Respondent the amount of the filing fee of twenty-five dollars and any other costs associated with the action that were incurred by Requester, excepting attorney fees.
Judges: Sadler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.