Skip to main content
· 4/4/1960

Rose v. Harriett Cotton Mills

Citations

  • 362 U.S. 941
  • 80 S. Ct. 806
  • 4 L. Ed. 2d 770
  • 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1387

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that if defendant actually misled the public about the availability of plaintiffs servicing and warranties, plaintiff “may be liable in contract or tort, but not in trademark”
  • wholly owned subsidiary of foreign manufacturer cannot invoke Lanham Act to prevent third party from importing parent company’s product
  • NEC Electronics “imports ninety percent of the NEC chips it sells from the parent company”
  • in 1983, NEC assigned its United States rights to the trademark “NEC” to NEC Electronics
  • NEC’s directors constitute a majority of NEC Electronics’ board of directors
  • parent and subsidiary are part of a $2 billion-a-year corporate network

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.