Rose v. Fritz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A 3 final judgment without prejudice is different from a final judgment with prejudice [] in 4 the sense that it does not preclude a subsequent action based on the same claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Kemmer v. Keiski
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-05-20· cited 22×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Catlin v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1945-02-26· cited 2,668×
• Beal v. City of Seattle
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-04-02· cited 145×
• Beal for Martinez v. City of Seattle
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-04-02· cited 142×
• Kingery v. Department of Labor & Industries
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-05-22· cited 71×
• Lejeune v. Clallam County
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-02-10· cited 53×
• Fox v. Sunmaster Products, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1990-10-25· cited 53×
• Anderson & Middleton Lumber Co. v. Quinault Indian Nation
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-12-26· cited 51×
• Anderson & Middleton Lumber Co. v. Quinault Indian Nation
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-09-06· cited 34×
• Pekin Insurance v. Benson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-06-30· cited 34×
• Matter of Marriage of Greenlaw
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-03-17· cited 33×
• In re the Marriage of Shoemaker
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-11-09· cited 33×
• In Re Marriage of Shoemaker
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-11-09· cited 32×
• Matter of Marriage of Greenlaw
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-01-28· cited 15×
• Lee v. Ferryman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-10-31· cited 14×
• Rhodes v. D & D Enterprises Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1976-09-07· cited 11×
• Kingery v. Department of Labor & Industries
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-02-23· cited 10×