Rose v. Food Fair Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the parol evidence rule precludes proof of oral representations that would “directly contradict the clear meaning of the written contract”
• summary judgment properly entered where averments of complaint could not be proved because of parol evidence rule
• “the parol evidence rule is a substantive rule of contract law that prevents the use of extrinsic evidence to nullify, modify, or augment the terms of a contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).