Rose v. Fairfield Cty. Sheriff Office Jail

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 4827

Syllabus

On Requester's objections, the Court overruled Requester's objections to a Special Master's Report and Recommendation. The Court adopted the Report and Recommendation. In accordance with the Report and Recommendation, the Court found that Requester's claim for production of records was moot. The Court further found that Respondent failed to produce requested public records within a reasonable period of time. Because Respondent had denied Requester access to public records in violation of RC. 149.43(B), the Court determined that Requester was entitled to recover from Respondent the amount of the filing fee of twenty-five dollars and any other costs associated with the action that are incurred by Requester, excepting attorney fees.