Rose v. Ellis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff need not allege proper avoidance of the statute of limitations in a specific action unless it is first raised as a defense.
• holding General Statutes § 52-592 \need not be pleaded in the complaint but only in response to [the Statute of Limitations] . . . defense properly raised\
• \matters in avoidance of the statute of limitations need not be pleaded in the complaint but only in response to such a defense properly raised.\
• defense of statute of limitations not properly raised on a motion to dismiss
• ‘‘[i]t has been and is the holding of this court that matters in avoidance of the [s]tatute of [l]imitations need not be pleaded in the complaint but only in response to such a defense properly raised’’
• matters in avoidance of the statute of limitations must be specially pleaded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).