Rose v. Educational Credit Management Corp. (In Re Rose)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the debtor offered no evidence as to future factors that could change her income, such as the need to purchase a vehicle, and thus, the court could only speculate as to what those changes might be
• denying discharge based in part on the fact that the student loan debtor had presented “no evidence ... that she has health issues that will in the near future prevent her from working”
• court denied medical hardship discharge based in part on the fact that the student loan debtor had presented “no evidence. .. .that she has health issues that will in the near future prevent her from working.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).