Rose v. Chrysler Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We cannot hold that the instant document must be given an interpretation that would provide only ‘illusory’ protection, and which, considered in the context of the basic warranty made, would be tantamount to a fraudulent defeat of the natural understanding of the purchaser.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).