Skip to main content
· 7/18/1985

Rose v. Batson v. Neal Spelce Associates, Inc.

Citations

  • 765 F.2d 511
  • 38 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 867
  • 2 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 828
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20350
  • 38 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,563

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[D]ismissal is authorized only when the failure to comply with the court’s order results from willfulness or bad faith, and not from the inability to comply.”
  • “[D]ismissal is authorized only when the failure to comply with the court’s order results from willfulness or bad faith, and not from the inability to comply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goldberg, Tate, Jolly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.