Skip to main content
· 8/1/2013

Rose v. Bank of America

Citations

  • 57 Cal. 4th 390
  • 304 P.3d 181
  • 159 Cal. Rptr. 3d 693
  • 2013 WL 3942612
  • 2013 Cal. LEXIS 6521

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even the abolition of a private right of action in an underlying statute “does not amount to a bar against UCL claims” premised on that statute
  • “Private plaintiffs suing under the UCL may seek only injunctive and 18 restitutionary relief, and the UCL does not authorize attorney fees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corrigan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.