Rose v. Arkansas Valley Environmental & Utility Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “the appropriate focus of inquiry ... should simply be upon the extent to which the claims asserted in the earlier class proceeding have in fact placed a defendant upon notice of the claims presently at issue”
• noting that it is the “prevailing view” to allow pendent personal jurisdiction with regard to state-law claims which are connected to claims arising out of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act
• particular defendant’s neither performing acts within the forum state nor knowing of other codefendants’ in-state acts may affect his liability, but is immaterial for the purposes of Section 78aa

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).