Skip to main content
· 12/30/2015

Roscoemanuel James Daniels v. United States

Citations

  • 809 F.3d 588
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 22825
  • 2015 WL 9583893

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a pro se prisoner’s filing is generally deemed filed on the date that he (or she) delivered it to prison authorities for mailing
  • stating that absent contrary evidence, we will as- sume that a prisoner’s filing was delivered to prison authorities on the date that he signed it
  • stating that a “pro se prisoner’s court filing is deemed filed on the date it is delivered to prison authorities for mailing”
  • providing that, absent contrary evidence, we assume a prisoner’s filing was deliv- ered to prison authorities on the day that he signed it
  • explaining that, under the prison mailbox rule, “a pro se prisoner’s court filing is deemed filed on the date it is delivered to prison authorities for mailing” (quotations omitted)
  • finding that a district court did not err in dismissing motion to vacate as untimely where movant failed to declare that first-class postage had been prepaid as required by Rule 3(d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carnes, Hull, Marcus, Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.