Skip to main content
· 5/14/2004

Rosas v. Monroe County Tax Claim Bureau

Citations

  • 323 B.R. 893
  • 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 2330
  • 2004 WL 3311486

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Accordingly, the Rosases should be compensated for the day of work they both missed in order to deal with the notice.”’
  • “There is a clear dif- ference between the plain meaning of the words ‘could’, ‘might’ and ‘will.’ ”
  • “I have heretofore held that actual injury is a condition precedent to the award of damages, including attorney’s fees and punitive damages.”
  • tax notices sent to debtors were coercive and went beyond the scope of the exception to the automatic stay by including a threat that their homes would be sold unless the taxes were paid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John J. Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.