Skip to main content
· 5/8/2007

Rosario v. Miami-Dade County

Citations

  • 490 F. Supp. 2d 1213
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43357
  • 2007 WL 1649659

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that \this Court has repeatedly recognized that 'final policymaking authority for Miami-Dade County rests with the Board of County Commissioners or the City Manager\
  • explaining that the plaintiffs “failed to allege any facts in support of their claim that [the challenged actions] constituted the customs, policies, and practices” of the municipal defendants (alteration added; quotation marks omitted)
  • dismissing section 1983 claim where plaintiffs “failed to allege any facts” in support of her claim beyond her own isolated incident
  • whether employee has final policymaking authority is a question of law for the judge to decide

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ungaro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.