Rosario v. Cacace

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a language requirement is not discriminatory under the NJLAD unless the “plaintiff . . . could prove that [the] rule was used as a surrogate for discrimination on the basis of national origin, ancestry, or any other prohibited grounds”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).