Supreme Court· 3/2/1987

Rosano v. United States

Citations

107 S. Ct. 1350
94 L. Ed. 2d 521
480 U.S. 907
55 U.S.L.W. 3586
1987 U.S. LEXIS 992

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that only the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment mandates payment for violations and that all claims founded on other constitutional amendments are outside the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims
stating that only the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment mandates payment for violations and that all claims founded on other constitutional amendments are outside the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims
res judicata barred affirmative defense of fraudulent inducement to enter into a contract when party failed to assert defense before arbitration panel with jurisdiction to hear it
party failing to raise fraud defense in prior proceeding foreclosed from bringing later RICO claim based on previously unmentioned allegations of fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Rosano v. United States

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.