Rosales v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that circumstantial evidence that does not point more strongly to a conclusion opposite to direct testimony “amounts to mere speculation, conjecture, or possibility insufficient to preclude summary judgment”
• “Circumstantial evidence has no probative value to establish a fact where it is consistent with direct, unimpeached evidence showing the nonexistence of such fact.”
• “Circumstantial evidence has no probative value to establish a fact where it is consistent with direct, unimpeached evidence showing the nonexistence of such fact.”
• circumstantial evidence that does not point more strongly to a conclusion opposite that established by direct evidence “amounts to mere speculation, conjecture, or possibility insufficient to preclude summary judgment”
• “The dismissal of less than all the parties from an action . . . is accomplished under OCGA § 9-11-21 with the requirement that it be done by order of the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).