Skip to main content
· 8/18/2005

Rosales v. Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement

Citations

  • 426 F.3d 733

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the REAL ID Act amended the jurisdictional provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”)
  • recognizing that the REAL ID Act amended the jurisdictional pro- visions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”)
  • holding that the petitioner subject to a final deportation order was “in custody” because the federal government had placed significant restraints on his liberty
  • recognizing that the REAL ID Act amended the jurisdictional provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”)
  • holding that the courts of appeal were the “exclusive forum” for challenges to removal orders and addressing the merits of a habeas case transferred from a district court that challenged a removal order on due process grounds
  • noting that “by statute, [the petitioner’s] removal period does not start until his state term of incarceration ends.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reavley, Jolly, Higginbotham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.