Skip to main content
· 7/19/1948

Rosado v. Rosario Alejandrino

Citations

  • 69 P.R. 158

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declaring that violation of Act No. 75 is an illicit contractual act, not an illicit extra contractual act, and therefore deciding that the Commerce Code, not the Civil Code, provides the tolling rules for Act No. 75’s statute of limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Herein, Jesús, Marrero, Snyder, Todd, Travieso

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.