Skip to main content
· 10/7/2019

Rosado v. Lucid Energy, Inc.

Citations

  • 140 S. Ct. 335
  • 205 L. Ed. 2d 11

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[C]harging monopoly prices—without accompanying anticompetitive conduct—is not enough to state a claim under Section 2.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.