Rosado Ruiz, Soraya v. Neomed Center, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s failure to provide long term care services in a particular setting to one group of disabled individuals but not another, solely on the basis of income, was discrimination in violation of the ADA
• noting that, ordinarily, public entities are not required 5 to “make modifications that would fundamentally alter existing programs and services”
• finding that “states could avoid compliance with the ADA by characterizing services offered in one isolated location as a program distinct from the provision of the same services in an integrated location”
• noting the distinction between whether services will be provided and where services will be provided
• remanding an ADA integration claim for consideration of an Olmstead prong not reached by the trial court
• considering state policy requiring certain Medicaid recipients with disabilities to receive services in nursing homes rather than “community-based” settings, without describing “community-based” settings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).