Rosa v. Doggett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Section 3111.03 “catalogues a series of presumptions that apply to the existence of the relationship drawn into question” by an action under Section 3111.04.
• noting a strong public interest in finality served by affording consent decrees res judicata
• court agreed that a non-adversarial dissolution of marriage was res judicata, thereby barring a subsequent paternity action brought pursuant to the Uniform Parentage Act
• court agreed that a non-adversarial dissolution of marriage was res judicata, thereby barring a subsequent paternity action brought pursuant to the Uniform Parentage Act
• specifically rejecting the contention that the analogous provision in the Ohio Parentage Act barred consideration of paternity determined in a divorce judgment arising from a stipulation
• specifically rejecting the contention that the analogous provision in the Ohio Parentage Act barred consideration of paternity determined in a divorce judgment arising from a stipulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).