Ros v. Ros

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the insured added a new car to a policy through an endorsement, and the policy contained a finite after-acquired-vehicle clause, the insurer needed to \secure a new waiver in order to prohibit the [insured] from stacking UIM benefits\
• finding the policy at issue did contain a “finite” clause requiring new stacking waiver forms to be presented to insureds
• analyzing the after-acquired-vehicle clause first, and concluding that the clause was finite, before analyzing whether the plaintiffs’ additional vehicles fit within its plain language
• finding appellant’s issue waived due to failure to cite legal authority in support of claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).