Roquemore v. Alloway
Citations
- 33 Tex. 461
Syllabus
<p>i. A noto given in 18G1 for a horse on which the purchaser designed to serve, and did serve in the rebel army, the destined use of the horse being known to the seller at the time, was an illegal contract; and such a contract could acquire no validity by transfer for value and before maturity to another person, however ignorant such other person might he of the illegality of the note.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- relying only on federal law to hold that the “failure to advise an accused that his sentences may run consecutively is not a ‘consequence’ of the plea concerning which the court must first address the defendant before accepting the plea”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.