Skip to main content
· 11/8/2007

Rooz v. Kimmel (In Re Kimmel)

Citations

  • 378 B.R. 630
  • 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 4237
  • 2007 WL 4124290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he chapter 7 discharge is absolute and, in light of the anti-waiver 25 provisions of § 524(a), does not admit of an equitable exception 26 that would permit it to be waived by postdischarge conduct.”
  • “First, the chapter 7 discharge is absolute and, in light of the anti- waiver provisions of § 524(a), does not admit of an equitable exception that would permit it to be waived by postdischarge conduct.”
  • “Whether it was listed on the schedules is irrelevant.”
  • “Section 541 is self effectuating.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dunn, Markell, Klein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.