Root v. Ames Department Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that Rule 26(e) “does not give license to sandbag one’s opponent”
• expert reports were insufficient under Rule 26 because they did not “set forth the expected testimony of the experts as to how and why they reached their opinions”
• further observing that “Rule 37 addresses failures to comply with the discovery provisions: ‘If a party fails to provide information or identify a witness as required by Rule 26(a) or (e

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).