· 6/28/2005
Roos v. Red
Citations
- 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 446
- 130 Cal. App. 4th 870
- 2005 Daily Journal DAR 7899
- 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5743
- 2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1029
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “important new witness” did not prevent issue preclusion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Woods
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.