Roop v. City of Philadelphia
Citations
- 266 Pa. 353
- 109 A. 595
- 1920 Pa. LEXIS 572
Syllabus
<p>Negligence — Municipality—Icy sidewalk — Constructive notice— Evidence — Records of weather bureau — Ordinance.</p> <p>1. A verdict is properly directed for defendant in an action against a city to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff by a fall on an icy sidewalk covered with snow, where it did not appear how long the ice had been there, nor that the city had either actual or constructive notice of the icy condition of the path.</p> <p>2. The records of the weather bureau and a city ordinance providing a penalty for permitting ice to remain on paved footways, offered in evidence in this case, held not sufficient to prove constructive notice of the condition of the path.</p>
Judges: Brown, Kephart, Moschzisker, Simpson, Walling
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.