Skip to main content
· 3/14/1995

Rooney v. Shalala

Citations

  • 879 F. Supp. 252
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3403
  • 1995 WL 114779

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • believing reapplication and requesting a hearing to be equivalent, plaintiff filed a new application.
  • plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a new application two years after her initial denial because she was unaware that reapplication was not the same as requesting a hearing.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trager

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.