· 3/14/1995
Rooney v. Shalala
Citations
- 879 F. Supp. 252
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3403
- 1995 WL 114779
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- believing reapplication and requesting a hearing to be equivalent, plaintiff filed a new application.
- plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a new application two years after her initial denial because she was unaware that reapplication was not the same as requesting a hearing.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Trager
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.