· 1/25/1936
Rooney v. Inheritance Tax Commission
Citations
- 143 Kan. 143
- 53 P.2d 500
- 1936 Kan. LEXIS 290
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that a jury verdict is not inconsistent so long as there is an interpretation of the evidence that provides a logical explanation for the jury’s findings
- providing that a jury verdict is not inconsistent so long as there is an interpretation of the evidence that provides a logical explanation for the jury’s findings
- “The purpose of the appellate preservation requirements is to induce litigants to do what they can in the trial court to prevent error and eliminate its prejudice, or to create a record of the error and its prejudice.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.