Skip to main content
· 1/25/1936

Rooney v. Inheritance Tax Commission

Citations

  • 143 Kan. 143
  • 53 P.2d 500
  • 1936 Kan. LEXIS 290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that a jury verdict is not inconsistent so long as there is an interpretation of the evidence that provides a logical explanation for the jury’s findings
  • providing that a jury verdict is not inconsistent so long as there is an interpretation of the evidence that provides a logical explanation for the jury’s findings
  • “The purpose of the appellate preservation requirements is to induce litigants to do what they can in the trial court to prevent error and eliminate its prejudice, or to create a record of the error and its prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.