Roof v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the reference \in Briceno that the defendant must know a child is present is dictum.\
• concluding that the reference \in Briceno that the defendant must know a child is present is dictum.\
• concluding that the reference “in Briceno that the defendant must know a child is present is dictum.”
• analyzing legislative history of section 21.11 and finding legislature did not intend to require a mental state in regard to the age of the child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).