Roof v. Howard University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the fact that harassment stopped for a period of fifteen months after the employer’s corrective action showed that the action was appropriate
• “Because the legal standard for discrimination under the DCHRA is substantively the same as under Title VII, the Court will consider both claims together.”
• “Title VII does not prohibit all forms of workplace harassment [instead] only harassment based on a person’s membership in a class protected by Title VII [is prohibited].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).