Ronningen v. Calnan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• clarifying “a line of demarcation between . . . the intent with which a purpose is expressed in a duly executed and authenticated will” and the intent to sign the will as required by law
• signature serves “to prevent any addition being made to the will, after the testator had executed it”
• “The omission of any of the requirements of the statute will not be overlooked on the ground that it is beyond question that the paper was executed by the decedent as his will . . . and there is no question of his testamentary purpose[.]”
• “The omission of any of the requirements of the statute will not be overlooked on the ground that it is beyond question that the paper was executed by the decedent as his will . . . and there is no question of his testamentary purpose . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).