Ronnie Tootle v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that officers violated the Fourth Amendment by conducting a search of a cell phone seized at the border where the reasonable suspicion was based on a report that the defendant had sexually trafficked a minor
• explaining that where “the Government conduct[s] the challenged searches without warrants, it bears the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that an exception to the warrant requirement applies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).