Ronnie Bradfield v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that the standard developed in Gingrich and applied in the present case sought to balance the legislative goal of removing unsafe drivers from the roads with the constitutional mandate to afford due process in the context of an extraordinary delay
• characterizing Gingrich’s holding as being grounded on an “implicit . . . due process consideration”
• “Although [Subsection] 6323(1)(i) does contain a 10-day reporting requirement, there was concern that strictly enforcing this requirement by invalidating license suspensions that were not reported within 10 days would undermine public safety.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).