Ronna ZAKEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bonnie BOERER, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Without identification of declarant, the statement . . . did not have a sufficient evidentiary foundation” for admission under Rule 801(d)(2)(D).”
• statement regarding reason for plaintiff's termination excluded because not attributed to specific individual
• court discusses admissibility of evidence against defendant “in her individual capacity”
• “[Without identification of the declarant, the statement concerning the reason for [the plaintiffs] termination did not have a sufficient evidentiary foundation to establish the existence of an agency relationship as required under Rule 801(d)(2)(D).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).