Roney v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he work product doctrine ... does not protect factual information that a lawyer obtains when investigating a ease.”
• “where the discoverable information ... has already been produced in some manner (either through prior document production or through Rule 26 disclosures or by answering interrogatories about persons with knowledge and the substance of that knowledge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).