Skip to main content
· 2/4/1991

Rones v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America

Citations

  • 804 P.2d 649
  • 60 Wash. App. 496
  • 1991 Wash. App. LEXIS 43

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where third-party plaintiff failed to meet the “no action” clause requirements, “the ‘no action’ clause is a complete defense” against the plaintiff’s third-party claim
  • where third-party plaintiff failed to meet the \no action\ clause requirements, \the 'no action' clause is a complete defense\ against the plaintiffs third-party claim
  • where third-party plaintifffailed to meet the \no action\ clause requirements, \the 'no action' clause is a complete defense\ against the plaintiffs third-party claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scholfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.