· 2/4/1991
Rones v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America
Citations
- 804 P.2d 649
- 60 Wash. App. 496
- 1991 Wash. App. LEXIS 43
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where third-party plaintiff failed to meet the “no action” clause requirements, “the ‘no action’ clause is a complete defense” against the plaintiff’s third-party claim
- where third-party plaintiff failed to meet the \no action\ clause requirements, \the 'no action' clause is a complete defense\ against the plaintiffs third-party claim
- where third-party plaintifffailed to meet the \no action\ clause requirements, \the 'no action' clause is a complete defense\ against the plaintiffs third-party claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scholfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.