Skip to main content
· 3/15/1832

Rondeau v. Pedesclaux

Citations

  • 3 La. 510

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • being required to wear a hat and hairnet while on duty is not an adverse employment action
  • “[I]f a failure to investigate does not qualify as an adverse employment action under Title VII’s broader definition of the term for retaliation claims, such failure plainly does not qualify under the stricter definition for discrimination claims.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.