Ronda Ship Management Inc. v. Doha Asian Games Organising, Committee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “Aqua Stoli implies that a plaintiff need not provide evidence showing that it has a claim against the defendant to satisfy its burden under Rule E(4)(f)”
• describing the inquiry as “whether a claim facially falling within the court’s [admiralty] jurisdiction is ‘immaterial,’ ‘insubstantial’ or ‘frivolous’ ”
• finding good cause to reduce the at tachment where plaintiff seeks security for damages arising from a charter party that is not mentioned in the complaint
• reducing the maritime attachment on other grounds, namely because the original attachment included a charter-party that was not at issue in the complaint
• “The prima facie standard in the maritime attachment context is a pleading requirement, not an evidentiary standard ....”
• “The majority of courts in this district have understood Aqua Stoli to require the application of the prima facie standard when considering the adequacy of a claim in a maritime vacatur motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).