Ronda-Perez v. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employer’s investigation deficiencies, including failure to take adequate notes was not sufficient evidence of pretext
• explaining that the relevant inquiry was not whether complaints made by fellow employees were true, but whether plaintiff's superiors believed that the complaints were credible when they decided to terminate him
• finding no evidence of pretext based on employer's failure to keep notes during investigative interview with plaintiff even though it kept notes during interviews with other employees
• mere inaccuracies or irregularities in investigation into misconduct not suggestive of deceit to cover unlawful purposes
• “Plaintiff’s plea that his denials establish triable issues of fact foreclosing summary judgment would, if accepted, spell the end of summary judgment.”
• “Plaintiffs plea that his denials establish triable issues of fact foreclosing summary, judgment would, if accepted, spell the end of summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).