Ronbeck Const. Co., Inc. v. Savanna Club Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Florida courts, like federal courts, should resolve all doubts in favor of arbitration
• noting that the rule requiring affir-mance based on the absence of a transcript “applies only where the trial court’s decision turns on its resolution of contested facts”
• upholding an arbitration clause which stated that “[a]ll claims or disputes arising out of this Contract or the breach thereof shall be decided by arbitration” (emphasis removed)
• discussing \separability\ pursuant to section 682.03 of the Florida Arbitration Code
• “The rule of Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979), applies only where the trial court’s decision turns on its resolution of contested facts.”
• arbitration is a favored means of dispute resolution and all doubts regarding the scope of an arbitration agreement and the existence of a waiver of arbitration should be resolved in favor of arbitration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).