Ronald Whitfield v. Big Star Honda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that federal bank robbery required knowing conduct sufficient for purposes of elements clause
• accepting district court’s 20 determination that “§ 2113(a) was a divisible statute because it contained two paragraphs, each containing a separate version of the crime”
• leaving undisturbed the District Court’s determination that § 2113(a) is a divisible statute “because it contain[s] two paragraphs, each containing a separate version of the crime”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).